State v. Smith

379 A.2d 1275, 75 N.J. 81
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 18, 1977·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

75 N.J. 81 (1977)
379 A.2d 1275

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIE D. SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 18, 1977.
Decided November 18, 1977.

Ms. Randall W. Westreich, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Burrell Ives Humphreys, Passaic County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Humphreys, attorney; Mr. Gary S. Schlyen, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. John DeCicco, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Marianne Espinosa, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 140 N.J. Super. 368.

For affirmance — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER — 5.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 379 A.2d 1275, 75 N.J. 81 (N.J. 1977).

379 A.2d 1275 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Bruzzese
463 A.2d 320 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
State v. Gaines
379 A.2d 1275 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)