State v. Smith
Opinion
ORDER
Michael 0. Smith (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a bench trial, convicting him of one count of resisting a lawful detention and one count of assaulting a police officer in the third-degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
366 S.W.3d 654 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.