State v. Smith

303 S.W.3d 633, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 210, 2010 WL 623645
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 S.W.3d 85
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 92707·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of two counts of first-degree child molestation, in violation of Section 566.067, RSMo 2000, 1 for which he was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

*634 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 303 S.W.3d 633, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 210, 2010 WL 623645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

303 S.W.3d 633 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Murphy
303 S.W.3d 633 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)