State v. Smith
344 S.W.3d 268, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 772, 2011 WL 2206719
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410 →
Opinion
*269 ORDER
Lee A. Smith appeals the judgment entered after a bench trial convicting him of first-degree child molestation. We find that the trial court did not err in its judgment and in denying Smith’s motion for judgment of acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Smith, 344 S.W.3d 268, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 772, 2011 WL 2206719 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
344 S.W.3d 268 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.