State v. Smith

654 So. 2d 1299, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5755, 1995 WL 322660
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1995·No. No. 94-1307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STEVENSON, Judge.

The State of Florida argues and the defendant below concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing defendant as a youthful offender where defendant was over the age of 21 when the offenses were committed. See § 958.04(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). Therefore, we vacate this illegal sentence. Because the trial court intimated quite clearly to defendant prior to the entry of the plea that it was going to sentence him as a youthful offender if defendant pled guilty, we remand this case to the trial court to give defendant the oppor[1300]*1300tunity to withdraw his plea prior to resen-tencing.

Reversed and remanded.

GLICKSTEIN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 654 So. 2d 1299, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5755, 1995 WL 322660 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

654 So. 2d 1299 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Malone
50 So. 3d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)