State v. Smith

627 So. 2d 1345, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12686, 1993 WL 536037
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1993·No. No. 93-1165·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As correctly noted by the appellee, this case, in which the court improperly sentenced the defendant below the proper guideline sentence, is governed by State v. Fields, 602 So.2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Accordingly, the downward departure sentence imposed in this case must be reversed and the cause remanded with the defendant being given the opportunity to withdraw his plea. This ruling does not preclude the pos[1346]*1346sibility of a reimposition of a downward departure sentence if the test set forth by Herrin v. State, 568 So.2d 920 (Fla.1990) is satisfied.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 627 So. 2d 1345, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12686, 1993 WL 536037 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 1345 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tiedge
670 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Franquiz
654 So. 2d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)