State v. Smith

596 So. 2d 168, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 586 So. 2d 1237
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1992·No. Nos. 91-3092, 91-3125·Published

Opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

On December 9, 1991, we issued our opinion wherein we found that the State of Florida could not obtain review, either by appeal or extraordinary writ, of an order which denied a motion to vacate an order terminating community control without notice to the State. We have now considered the State’s motion for rehearing and find that our reliance on State v. Magrath, 517 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) was misplaced in light of State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); see also State v. Rhodes, 554 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Accordingly, we withdraw our prior opinion and accept common law certiorari jurisdiction of case number 91-3092 pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A). Respondent shall show cause within 20 days why the petition for writ of certiorari should not be granted.

The appellate proceeding, case number 91-3125, shall remain dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

JOANOS, C.J., and SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 596 So. 2d 168, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4246 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 168 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rhodes
554 So. 2d 1229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Pettis
520 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Magrath
517 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)