State v. Smith

659 So. 2d 267, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1390, 1995 WL 500405
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 641 So. 2d 849
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 24, 1995·No. No. 85221·Published

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Smith v. State, 649 So.2d 362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), based on conflict with Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently addressed this issue in State v. Blackwell, 661 So.2d 282 (Fla.1995). We quash Smith and remand for proceedings consistent with Blackwell.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 659 So. 2d 267, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 446, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1390, 1995 WL 500405 (Fla. 1995).

659 So. 2d 267 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashley v. State
614 So. 2d 486 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
State v. Blackwell
661 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Smith v. State
649 So. 2d 362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)