State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Smith

616 So. 2d 52, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 241, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 609, 1993 WL 102307

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 8, 1993·No. No. 80908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Smith v. State, 608 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Smith and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Smith v. State, 608 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Smith and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

State v. Smith, 616 So. 2d 52, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 241, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 609, 1993 WL 102307 (Fla. 1993).

Pincite

616 So. 2d 52 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related