State v. Slack

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Slack

318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1041, 2010 WL 3239138

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 17, 2010

DocketED 93182

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 318 S.W.3d 312 (State v. Slack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Slack, 318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1041, 2010 WL 3239138 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Slack appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree sodomy and one count of child molestation in the first degree. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Slack appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree sodomy and one count of child molestation in the first degree. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1041, 2010 WL 3239138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-slack-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack