Davison v. State
318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1044, 2010 WL 3239137
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Ted E. Davison, Jr., appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davison v. State, 318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1044, 2010 WL 3239137 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
318 S.W.3d 312 (Davison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Slack
318 S.W.3d 312 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)