Davison v. State
318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1044, 2010 WL 3239137
This text of 318 S.W.3d 312 (Davison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davison v. State, 318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1044, 2010 WL 3239137 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Ted E. Davison, Jr., appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Slack
318 S.W.3d 312 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
318 S.W.3d 312, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1044, 2010 WL 3239137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davison-v-state-moctapp-2010.