State v. Singleton

688 So. 2d 486, 1997 La. LEXIS 535
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Singleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 688 So. 2d 486
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 7, 1997·No. No. 96-K-2380·Published

Opinion

In re Singleton, Jermaine; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 94-0692; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-KA-0203.

Granted in part; denied in part. Relator’s sentence is amended to delete the denial of eligibility for diminution of sentence for good behavior pursuant to La.R.S. 15:571.3(A). Application of La.C.Cr.P. art. 890.1 to deny good time eligibility on a sentence imposed for a crime committed before the effective date of 1995 LaActs No. 946 violates the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the federal and state constitutions. Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 30-32, 101 S.Ct. 960, 965, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981). In all other respects, relator’s application is denied.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Singleton, 688 So. 2d 486, 1997 La. LEXIS 535 (La. 1997).

688 So. 2d 486 (State v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weaver v. Graham
450 U.S. 24 (Supreme Court, 1981)