State v. Singh

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Singh

2001 Ohio 126, 92 Ohio St. 3d 1213

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 27, 2001

Docket2000-1536

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 126 (State v. Singh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Singh, 2001 Ohio 126, 92 Ohio St. 3d 1213 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 1213.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SINGH, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Singh, 2001-Ohio-126.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1536—Submitted May 15, 2001—Decided June 27, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 98-L-090. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, Vincent A. Culotta, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Brian L. Summers, Supervisor, Appellate Division, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Morganstern, MacAdams & DeVito Co., L.P.A., and Michael A. Partlow, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Michael R. Gladman, Assistant Solicitor, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Attorney General of Ohio. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 1213.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SINGH, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Singh, 2001-Ohio-126.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1536—Submitted May 15, 2001—Decided June 27, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 98-L-090. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, Vincent A. Culotta, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Brian L. Summers, Supervisor, Appellate Division, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Morganstern, MacAdams & DeVito Co., L.P.A., and Michael A. Partlow, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Michael R. Gladman, Assistant Solicitor, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Attorney General of Ohio. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 126, 92 Ohio St. 3d 1213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-singh-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack