Home/Idaho Supreme Court/State v. Sima

State v. Sima

570 P.2d 1333, 98 Idaho 643, 1977 Ida. LEXIS 440
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 11, 1977
Docket12338
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 570 P.2d 1333 (State v. Sima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sima, 570 P.2d 1333, 98 Idaho 643, 1977 Ida. LEXIS 440 (Idaho 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from Francis Sima’s conviction for violation of I.C. § 18-6710, making repeated anonymous telephone calls with the intent to annoy. We affirm. Appellant was charged with the offense and tried before a magistrate sitting without a jury. He was found guilty, convicted and sentenced to a suspended ten day sentence and the payment of a $50.00 fine. On appeal to the district court that conviction was affirmed.

*644 Other than the alleged facts set forth in appellant’s brief, we are without a record since appellant has failed to provide a reporter’s transcript. Upon appeal, appellant carries the burden of presenting such a record as to enable our review of the asserted errors. In the absence thereof we will not presume error. State v. Peterson, 87 Idaho 147, 391 P.2d 846 (1964). A litigant appearing pro se is held to the same standards and rules as one appearing with counsel. Scafco v. Rigby & Mason, 98 Idaho 432, 566 P.2d 381 (No. 12251, June 27, 1977).

The conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Erik Virgil Hall
419 P.3d 1042 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2018)
Lorezo Corral v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals, 2017
Adrian Harthcock v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals, 2016
State v. Tucker
953 P.2d 614 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1998)
Everhart v. Washington County Road & Bridge Department
939 P.2d 849 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1997)
Munster v. State
921 P.2d 765 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1996)
State v. Smith
906 P.2d 141 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1995)
State v. Stover
881 P.2d 553 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1994)
State v. Clark
859 P.2d 344 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1993)
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Krueger
861 P.2d 71 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1992)
State v. Beason
803 P.2d 1009 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1991)
Golay v. Loomis
797 P.2d 95 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Harrold
750 P.2d 959 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1988)
Golden Condor, Inc. v. Bell
739 P.2d 385 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Langley
719 P.2d 1155 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Burke
717 P.2d 1039 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1986)
State v. Murinko
702 P.2d 910 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1985)
State v. Whelan
651 P.2d 916 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)
State v. Mason
643 P.2d 78 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)
Makin v. Liddle
639 P.2d 3 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 P.2d 1333, 98 Idaho 643, 1977 Ida. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sima-idaho-1977.