State v. Short

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Short

273 S.W.3d 585, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2009 WL 113846

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 2009

DocketED 90809

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 S.W.3d 585 (State v. Short) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Short, 273 S.W.3d 585, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2009 WL 113846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kyle Short, Jr. (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court following jury convictions for three counts of statutory rape in the second degree and one count of attempted victim tampering in violation of section 566.034 RSMo Cum. Supp. 2006 and section 575.270 respectively. Defendant was charged as a persistent offender, and sentenced to terms of ten years’ imprisonment for each of the statutory rape convictions, with these sentences to run concurrently, and ten years’ imprisonment for the attempted victim tampering conviction, with that sentence to run consecutive to the other sentences.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kyle Short, Jr. (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court following jury convictions for three counts of statutory rape in the second degree and one count of attempted victim tampering in violation of section 566.034 RSMo Cum. Supp. 2006 and section 575.270 respectively. Defendant was charged as a persistent offender, and sentenced to terms of ten years’ imprisonment for each of the statutory rape convictions, with these sentences to run concurrently, and ten years’ imprisonment for the attempted victim tampering conviction, with that sentence to run consecutive to the other sentences.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 S.W.3d 585, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2009 WL 113846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-short-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack