State v. Shoff
466 S.E.2d 277, 342 N.C. 638, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 28
Opinion
The Court of Appeals correctly held that the order at issue was interlocutory and nonappealable. State v. Henry, 318 N.C. 408, 348 S.E.2d 593 (1986). The decision of the Court of Appeals is therefore
*639 AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Shoff, 466 S.E.2d 277, 342 N.C. 638, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 28 (N.C. 1996).
466 S.E.2d 277 (State v. Shoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Schalow
795 S.E.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
State v. Santos
708 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
State v. Berryman
624 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Brown
613 S.E.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Styron
604 S.E.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Pimental
568 S.E.2d 867 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Nichols
537 S.E.2d 825 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)