State v. Shoff
466 S.E.2d 277, 342 N.C. 638, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 28
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 9, 1996
Docket244PA95
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 466 S.E.2d 277 (State v. Shoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Shoff, 466 S.E.2d 277, 342 N.C. 638, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 28 (N.C. 1996).
Opinion
The Court of Appeals correctly held that the order at issue was interlocutory and nonappealable. State v. Henry, 318 N.C. 408, 348 S.E.2d 593 (1986). The decision of the Court of Appeals is therefore
*639 AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Schalow
795 S.E.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
State v. Santos
708 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
State v. Berryman
624 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Brown
613 S.E.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Styron
604 S.E.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Pimental
568 S.E.2d 867 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Nichols
537 S.E.2d 825 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
466 S.E.2d 277, 342 N.C. 638, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shoff-nc-1996.