Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Henry

State v. Henry

348 S.E.2d 593, 318 N.C. 408, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2653
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 7, 1986·No. 782PA85·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no provision for appeal to the Court of Appeals as a matter of right from an interlocutory order entered in a criminal case, State v. Thompson, 56 N.C. App. 439, 289 S.E. 2d 132 (1982); State v. Black, 7 N.C. App. 324, 172 S.E. 2d 217 (1970). Defendant may appeal the superior court order reversing dismissal of criminal charges against him and remanding the cause to the district court, “as in the case of other orders of the superior court,” after a final judgment has been entered in the superior court. N.C.G.S. 7A-27(b) (1981); 15A-1432(d) (1983); 15A-1444 (1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Henry, 348 S.E.2d 593, 318 N.C. 408, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2653 (N.C. 1986).

348 S.E.2d 593 (State v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Branham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
State v. Santifort
809 S.E.2d 213 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
State v. Smith
598 S.E.2d 408 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Shoff
466 S.E.2d 277 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1996)
State v. Barnes
427 S.E.2d 882 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
State v. Monroe
410 S.E.2d 913 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1991)
State v. Monroe
402 S.E.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
State v. Joseph
374 S.E.2d 132 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)