State v. Sherrill

678 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8661, 1996 WL 464090
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 1996
DocketNo. 96-510
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 678 So. 2d 7 (State v. Sherrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sherrill, 678 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8661, 1996 WL 464090 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

As the defendant properly concedes, a below guidelines departure sentence that lacks contemporaneous written reasons for departure must be remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Jones v. State, 639 So.2d 28, 29 (Fla.1994); Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). On remand, however, the trial court must give the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea. State v. Gordon, 645 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), review denied, 652 So.2d 816 (Fla.1995); State v. Grononger, 615 So.2d 869 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barr
947 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
State v. Nelson
692 So. 2d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8661, 1996 WL 464090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sherrill-fladistctapp-1996.