State v. Barr

947 So. 2d 1277
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 2007
Docket3D06-1439, 3D06-1437
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 947 So. 2d 1277 (State v. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Barr, 947 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

947 So.2d 1277 (2007)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Calvin BARR, Appellee.

Nos. 3D06-1439, 3D06-1437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 7, 2007.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Angel L. Fleming, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Before COPE, C.J., and GERSTEN and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, The State of Florida ("State") appeals the downward departure sentences imposed by the trial *1278 court, over State objection, in case numbers F04-37885 and F05-14. As the record reflects that the trial court failed to provide any reasons for its downward departure from the sentencing guidelines, either in writing or by orally pronouncing its reasons at sentencing, we reverse. See State v. Payne, 684 So.2d 863, 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)(holding that when a trial court enters a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines, it must provide valid written reasons for doing so); State v. Sherrill, 678 So.2d 7, 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(same); see also Pease v. State, 712 So.2d 374, 376-77 (Fla.1997)(holding that failure to provide valid written reasons for entering a departure downward from the sentencing guidelines may be affirmed if the trial court orally pronounces a valid basis for the sentence on the record).

Upon remand, the defendant may elect to withdraw his plea or be sentenced within the recommended sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Johnson
193 So. 3d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
State v. Smith
23 So. 3d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Armenteros
19 So. 3d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Roberts
963 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
947 So. 2d 1277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barr-fladistctapp-2007.