State v. Shea

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Shea

256 S.W.3d 158, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2008 WL 2097438

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2008·No. ED 89759·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Shea appeals the circuit court’s judgment upon his conviction after a bench trial for driving while intoxicated. Shea alleges that the court erred by giving greater weight to the testimony of a police officer than to that of three defense witnesses, namely Shea, his friend, and his father. We have reviewed Shea’s brief and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Shea appeals the circuit court’s judgment upon his conviction after a bench trial for driving while intoxicated. Shea alleges that the court erred by giving greater weight to the testimony of a police officer than to that of three defense witnesses, namely Shea, his friend, and his father. We have reviewed Shea’s brief and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Shea, 256 S.W.3d 158, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2008 WL 2097438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

256 S.W.3d 158 (State v. Shea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related