State v. Shea

256 S.W.3d 158, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2008 WL 2097438
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 20, 2008
DocketED 89759
StatusPublished

This text of 256 S.W.3d 158 (State v. Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Shea, 256 S.W.3d 158, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2008 WL 2097438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Shea appeals the circuit court’s judgment upon his conviction after a bench trial for driving while intoxicated. Shea alleges that the court erred by giving greater weight to the testimony of a police officer than to that of three defense witnesses, namely Shea, his friend, and his father. We have reviewed Shea’s brief and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FLEMONS v. State
256 S.W.3d 158 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 S.W.3d 158, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2008 WL 2097438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shea-moctapp-2008.