FLEMONS v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

FLEMONS v. State

256 S.W.3d 158, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 2008 WL 2097431

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2008·No. ED 90140·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Flemons (Appellant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion (Rule 24.035 motion) for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. Allen v. State, 219 S.W.3d 273, 276 (Mo.App. S.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule citations are to the Mo. R.Crim. P. 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Flemons (Appellant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion (Rule 24.035 motion) for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. Allen v. State, 219 S.W.3d 273, 276 (Mo.App. S.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule citations are to the Mo. R.Crim. P. 2004.

FLEMONS v. State, 256 S.W.3d 158, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 2008 WL 2097431 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

256 S.W.3d 158 (FLEMONS v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related