State v. Shantel Fowle

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 20, 2017
DocketA18A0077
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Shantel Fowle (State v. Shantel Fowle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Shantel Fowle, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 15, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0077. THE STATE v. SHANTEL FOWLE.

Shantel Fowle was charged with possession of less than one ounce of marijuana (a misdemeanor) and crossing the guard line at the Fulton County Jail with marijuana and without the warden’s consent, in violation of OCGA § 42-5-15 (a felony). Fowle moved to dismiss the felony count, and the trial court granted his motion. Among other things, the court ruled that Fowle did not violate OCGA § 42-5-15 because “he could not be forced to incriminate himself under the Fifth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution and the Georgia Constitution by being required to confess to the misdemeanor crime of possession of marijuana in order to avoid the felony charge.” The State appealed the dismissal order to this Court, but subsequently filed a motion to transfer the appeal to the Supreme Court under that Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over constitutional questions. The Supreme Court “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996) (citing Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1)). Because the trial court ruled, in essence, that OCGA § 42-5-15 is unconstitutional as applied to Fowle, it appears that jurisdiction over this appeal may lie in the Supreme Court. See Malloy v. State, 293 Ga. 350, 353 (1) (744 SE2d 778) (2013) (“this Court has jurisdiction over appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in rejecting his constitutional challenge to OCGA § 49-4-146.1 (b) (2) [the Medicaid fraud statute] as applied . . .”). Moreover, the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction. See Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996). For these reasons, the State’s motion to transfer the appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e , Atlanta,____________________ 11/15/2017 I certify that the abov e is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Medical Clinic, Inc.
476 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane
469 S.E.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Malloy v. State
744 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Shantel Fowle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-shantel-fowle-gactapp-2017.