State v. Serdahl
This text of 2023 ND 236 (State v. Serdahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2023 ND 236
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Wesley Wayne Serdahl, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20230204
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tiffany M. Sorgen, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Thomas J. Burckhard, Minot, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Serdahl No. 20230204
Wesley Wayne Serdahl appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of terrorizing. He argues the conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. “In reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” State v. Grant, 2023 ND 62, ¶ 18, 988 N.W.2d 563 (cleaned up). After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the conviction. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 ND 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-serdahl-nd-2023.