State v. Scott

1998 Ohio 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 22
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 Ohio St. 3d 1424
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 1998·No. 1998-0967·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 22.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SCOTT, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Scott, 1998-Ohio-690.] Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook. (Nos. 98-967 and 98-1535—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APA07-906. __________________ Judith M. Stevenson, Franklin County Public Defender, and John W. Keeling, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Scott, 1998 Ohio 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 22 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 690 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cook
700 N.E.2d 570 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)