State v. Scott
This text of 679 N.E.2d 1139 (State v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clark App. No. 95CA101. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s order revoking his probation, and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for [1414]*1414delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prae.R. II(2)(A)(4), apply. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
679 N.E.2d 1139, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1413, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scott-ohio-1997.