State v. Scott
571 A.2d 1304, 118 N.J. 406, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 35
Opinions
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashbey’s concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. at 269, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Scott, 571 A.2d 1304, 118 N.J. 406, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 35 (N.J. 1990).
571 A.2d 1304 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Edmonds
47 A.3d 737 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
State v. Witczak
23 A.3d 416 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
State v. Frankel
847 A.2d 561 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
State v. Cassidy
843 A.2d 1132 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
State v. Diloreto
829 A.2d 1123 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
State v. Frenkel
775 A.2d 665 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
State v. Frankel
775 A.2d 665 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
State v. Garbin
739 A.2d 1016 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
State v. Navarro
708 A.2d 416 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
State v. Garland
636 A.2d 541 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
State v. Moore
614 A.2d 1360 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
State v. Scott
571 A.2d 1304 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1990)