State v. Scott

187 S.E.2d 369, 14 N.C. App. 178, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2080
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 29, 1972
DocketNo. 7216SC91
StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.E.2d 369 (State v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Scott, 187 S.E.2d 369, 14 N.C. App. 178, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2080 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Counsel for defendant candidly states in his brief that he is unable to find error committed in the proceedings of the trial tribunal. The State in its brief agrees. We have examined and considered the record proper, and no prejudicial error appears.

Affirmed.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 S.E.2d 369, 14 N.C. App. 178, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scott-ncctapp-1972.