State v. Phillips

212 S.E.2d 39, 25 N.C. App. 109, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2189
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 5, 1975
DocketNo. 7426SC1063
StatusPublished

This text of 212 S.E.2d 39 (State v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Phillips, 212 S.E.2d 39, 25 N.C. App. 109, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2189 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

The judgment from which defendant appeals was entered on 30 July 1974 but the record on appeal was not docketed in this court until 16 December 1974. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina requires that the record on appeal be docketed within 90 days after the date [110]*110of the judgment appealed from, unless the trial tribunal, for good cause, extends the time for docketing for not more than 60 days.

In numerous cases we have held that an order of the trial tribunal extending the time to serve the case on appeal does not have the effect of extending the time to docket the appeal. The first of these was Smith v. Starnes, 1 N.C. App. 192, 160 S.E. 2d 547 (1968), and the principle has been restated in many others including the following: State v. Peek, 22 N.C. App. 350, 206 S.E. 2d 386 (1974) ; State v. Scott, 16 N.C. App. 424, 192 S.E. 2d 54 (1972) ; State v. Hunt, 14 N.C. App. 626, 188 S.E. 2d 546 (1972); State v. Brigman, 8 N.C. App. 316, 174 S.E. 2d 48 (1970) ; State v. Fulk, 7 N.C. App. 68, 171 S.E. 2d 81 (1969) ; Reece v. Reece, 6 N.C. App. 606, 170 S.E. 2d 546 (1969) ; and State v. Farrell, 3 N.C. App. 196, 164 S.E. 2d 388 (1968).

For failure of defendant to comply with the rules of this court, the appeal is dismissed.

Nevertheless, we have considered the questions raised in defendant’s brief but find them to be without merit. Defendant received a fair trial and the judgment imposed is within the limits provided by statute.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Morris and Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Farrell
164 S.E.2d 388 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Hunt
188 S.E.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Smith v. Starnes
160 S.E.2d 547 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)
Reece v. Reece
170 S.E.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Fulk
171 S.E.2d 81 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Brigman
174 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Scott
192 S.E.2d 54 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Peek
206 S.E.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 S.E.2d 39, 25 N.C. App. 109, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-phillips-ncctapp-1975.