State v. Scott

692 So. 2d 234, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4336, 1997 WL 185895
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1997·No. No. 96-969·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s failure to assess James E. Scott eighteen scoresheet points at sentencing. We reverse the sentence of probation and remand for resentenc-ing.

Scott pleaded guilty to two counts of dealing in stolen property, grand theft of a firearm and grand theft. Eighteen points should have been added to the scoresheet for the conviction of grand theft of a firearm. See e.g., Smith v. State, 683 So.2d 577 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); State v. Davidson, 666 So.2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); contra, Galloway v. State, 680 So.2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The failure to do so resulted in a departure sentence of probation instead of incarceration.

REVERSED AND REMANDED for re-sentencing consistent with this opinion.

W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Scott, 692 So. 2d 234, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4336, 1997 WL 185895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

692 So. 2d 234 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
718 So. 2d 751 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Doles v. State
710 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Fisher v. State
704 So. 2d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Coleman v. State
702 So. 2d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
In Re Estate of Hinterleiter
692 So. 2d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)