State v. Schwab
This text of 2015 ND 161 (State v. Schwab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 7/1/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 161
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Christopher Tylor Schwab, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20140467
Appeal from the District Court of Ransom County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jerod E. Tufte, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Fallon M. Kelly (argued), State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 391, Lisbon, ND 58054-0391, for plaintiff and appellee.
Jason R. Butts (on brief) and Amy M. Clark (argued), P.O. Box 38, Wahpeton, ND 58074-0038, defendant and appellant, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Schwab
[¶1] Christopher Tylor Schwab appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of accomplice to gross sexual imposition. On appeal, Schwab argues 1) insufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict and 2) the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a new trial because the weight of the evidence was against the jury’s verdict. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict and the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding the weight of the evidence was not against the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schwab-nd-2015.