State v. Schultz

716 N.E.2d 212, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2965
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Schultz. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 Ohio St. 3d 1437
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 1999·No. 98-1929·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-970954. By sua sponte orders, this court consolidated Supreme Court case Nos. 98-1779, State v. Conyers; 98-1929, State v. Schultz; and 98-2044, State v. Snowder. These cases have been set for oral argument on September 14, 1999, and pursuant to the court's orders of August 30, 1999, time for oral argument was extended to twenty minutes per side. Upon consideration of the joint motion to sever case No. 98-2044, State v. Snowder, from the remaining two cases,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to sever case No. 98-2044, State v. Snowder, from the remaining two cases be, and hereby is, granted, and that the court’s orders of August 30,1999, are vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that oral argument time for case No. 98-2044, State v. Snoivder, will be fifteen minutes per side and oral argument time for case Nos. 98-1779, State v. Conyers, and 98-1929, State v. Schultz, will be fifteen minutes per side.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Schultz, 716 N.E.2d 212, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2965 (Ohio 1999).

716 N.E.2d 212 (State v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.