State v. Schultz
This text of 715 N.E.2d 562 (State v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hamilton App. No. C-970954. By sua sponte orders this court consolidated Supreme Court case Nos. 97-1779, State v. Conyers; 98-1929, State v. Schultz; and 98-2044, State v. Snowder. These cases have been set for oral argument on September 14, 1999.
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that time for oral argument shall be extended to twenty minutes per side.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that counsel for the state of Ohio in the above-named cases shall argue first and shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement. Counsel for the opposing parties in these cases shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
715 N.E.2d 562, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schultz-ohio-1999.