State v. Schultz

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Schultz

715 N.E.2d 562, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2753

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Schultz. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 Ohio St. 3d 1437 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 30, 1999·No. 98-1929·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-970954. By sua sponte orders this court consolidated Supreme Court case Nos. 97-1779, State v. Conyers; 98-1929, State v. Schultz; and 98-2044, State v. Snowder. These cases have been set for oral argument on September 14, 1999.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that time for oral argument shall be extended to twenty minutes per side.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that counsel for the state of Ohio in the above-named cases shall argue first and shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement. Counsel for the opposing parties in these cases shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-970954. By sua sponte orders this court consolidated Supreme Court case Nos. 97-1779, State v. Conyers; 98-1929, State v. Schultz; and 98-2044, State v. Snowder. These cases have been set for oral argument on September 14, 1999.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that time for oral argument shall be extended to twenty minutes per side.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that counsel for the state of Ohio in the above-named cases shall argue first and shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement. Counsel for the opposing parties in these cases shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement.

State v. Schultz, 715 N.E.2d 562, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2753 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

715 N.E.2d 562 (State v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.