State v. Schroeder
675 P.2d 1111, 66 Or. App. 754, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2736
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 1, 1984·No. 82-21326-C; CA A28039·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
In this case of driving under the influence of intoxicants, defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence arising out of a traffic roadblock at which he was stopped and arrested. We cannot perceive a principled way in which this case may be distinguished from State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or 845, 618 P2d 423 (1980). It is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Schroeder, 675 P.2d 1111, 66 Or. App. 754, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2736 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
675 P.2d 1111 (State v. Schroeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Garcia
489 N.E.2d 168 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1986)
Little v. State
479 A.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1984)
State v. Schroeder
678 P.2d 1227 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Schroeder
675 P.2d 1111 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)