State v. Schroeder
675 P.2d 1111, 66 Or. App. 754, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2736
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 1, 1984
Docket82-21326-C; CA A28039
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 675 P.2d 1111 (State v. Schroeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Schroeder, 675 P.2d 1111, 66 Or. App. 754, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2736 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
In this case of driving under the influence of intoxicants, defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence arising out of a traffic roadblock at which he was stopped and arrested. We cannot perceive a principled way in which this case may be distinguished from State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or 845, 618 P2d 423 (1980). It is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Garcia
489 N.E.2d 168 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1986)
Little v. State
479 A.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1984)
State v. Schroeder
678 P.2d 1227 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Schroeder
675 P.2d 1111 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
675 P.2d 1111, 66 Or. App. 754, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schroeder-orctapp-1984.