State v. Schlieve

2018 ND 230, 918 N.W.2d 386
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 2018·No. 20180108·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*387 [¶1] Dana Schlieve appealed a district court judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years imprisonment. Schlieve argues the district court erred by not explicitly referencing which sentencing factors under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 were considered. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). State v. Gonzalez , 2011 ND 143 , ¶ 8, 799 N.W.2d 402 (a trial court need not explicitly reference the factors listed under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 and the factors do not constitute an exclusive list of all a trial court may consider in fixing a criminal sentence).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Zane Anderson, S.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Zane Anderson, S. J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Schlieve, 2018 ND 230, 918 N.W.2d 386 (N.D. 2018).

2018 ND 230 (State v. Schlieve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gonzalez
2011 ND 143 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)
State v. Gonzalez
2011 ND 143 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)