State v. Schlieve

2018 ND 230, 918 N.W.2d 386
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 11, 2018
Docket20180108
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 ND 230 (State v. Schlieve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schlieve, 2018 ND 230, 918 N.W.2d 386 (N.D. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*387 [¶1] Dana Schlieve appealed a district court judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years imprisonment. Schlieve argues the district court erred by not explicitly referencing which sentencing factors under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 were considered. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). State v. Gonzalez , 2011 ND 143 , ¶ 8, 799 N.W.2d 402 (a trial court need not explicitly reference the factors listed under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 and the factors do not constitute an exclusive list of all a trial court may consider in fixing a criminal sentence).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Zane Anderson, S.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Zane Anderson, S. J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gonzalez
2011 ND 143 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)
State v. Gonzalez
2011 ND 143 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 ND 230, 918 N.W.2d 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schlieve-nd-2018.