State v. SCHLAX

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. SCHLAX

342 S.W.3d 901, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 856, 2011 WL 2446570

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2011·No. WD 71274·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Schlax appeals his convictions following a jury trial for property damage in the first degree, section 569.100, leaving the scene of an accident, section 577.060, resisting arrest, section 575.150, operating a motor vehicle in a careless and imprudent manner, section 304.012, and assault in the third degree, section 565.070. On appeal, Schlax contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial after a witness testified that the vehicle Schlax was driving was stolen. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Schlax appeals his convictions following a jury trial for property damage in the first degree, section 569.100, leaving the scene of an accident, section 577.060, resisting arrest, section 575.150, operating a motor vehicle in a careless and imprudent manner, section 304.012, and assault in the third degree, section 565.070. On appeal, Schlax contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial after a witness testified that the vehicle Schlax was driving was stolen. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. SCHLAX, 342 S.W.3d 901, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 856, 2011 WL 2446570 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

342 S.W.3d 901 (State v. SCHLAX) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related