State v. Schiewek

215 P.3d 878, 229 Or. App. 712, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1027
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 15, 2009·No. 07C55468; A139821·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine. ORS 475.894. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of an unlawful seizure of his person. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Schiewek, 215 P.3d 878, 229 Or. App. 712, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1027 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

215 P.3d 878 (State v. Schiewek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. SCHIEWEK
215 P.3d 878 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)