State v. Schiewek

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Schiewek

215 P.3d 878, 229 Or. App. 712, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1027

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 15, 2009

Docket07C55468; A139821

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 P.3d 878 (State v. Schiewek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Schiewek, 215 P.3d 878, 229 Or. App. 712, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1027 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine. ORS 475.894. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of an unlawful seizure of his person. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine. ORS 475.894. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of an unlawful seizure of his person. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 P.3d 878, 229 Or. App. 712, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schiewek-orctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack