State v. Saylor

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Saylor

1999 Ohio 453, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1205

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1999

Docket1998-2066

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 453 (State v. Saylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Saylor, 1999 Ohio 453, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1205 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 1205.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SAYLOR, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Saylor, 1999-Ohio-453.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed—Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. (Nos. 98-2066 and 98-2067—Submitted March 10, 1999—Decided March 31, 1999.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA98-03-053. __________________ John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel, First Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and John M. Holcomb, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Richard E. Saylor, pro se. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed in case No. 98-2066. {¶ 2} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified in case No. 98-2067. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 3} I would accept this case and require that the matter be briefed and set for oral argument. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 1205.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SAYLOR, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Saylor, 1999-Ohio-453.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed—Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. (Nos. 98-2066 and 98-2067—Submitted March 10, 1999—Decided March 31, 1999.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA98-03-053. __________________ John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel, First Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and John M. Holcomb, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Richard E. Saylor, pro se. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed in case No. 98-2066. {¶ 2} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified in case No. 98-2067. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 3} I would accept this case and require that the matter be briefed and set for oral argument. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 453, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-saylor-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack