State v. Sawyer

2010 Ohio 923, 925 N.E.2d 126, 124 Ohio St. 3d 547
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 2010
Docket2009-1332
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2010 Ohio 923 (State v. Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sawyer, 2010 Ohio 923, 925 N.E.2d 126, 124 Ohio St. 3d 547 (Ohio 2010).

Opinions

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365, 2010-Ohio-1, 922 N.E.2d 923, as to the court of appeals’ holding that it was without authority to review appellant’s second and third assignments of error, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with State v. Underwood.

[548]*548Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent. Cupp, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Underwood.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Vitt
2012 Ohio 4438 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Sawyer
2010 Ohio 923 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 Ohio 923, 925 N.E.2d 126, 124 Ohio St. 3d 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sawyer-ohio-2010.