State v. Sawyer

2010 Ohio 923, 925 N.E.2d 126, 124 Ohio St. 3d 547
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 16, 2010·No. 2009-1332·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365, 2010-Ohio-1, 922 N.E.2d 923, as to the court of appeals’ holding that it was without authority to review appellant’s second and third assignments of error, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with State v. Underwood.

[548]*548Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent. Cupp, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Underwood.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sawyer, 2010 Ohio 923, 925 N.E.2d 126, 124 Ohio St. 3d 547 (Ohio 2010).

2010 Ohio 923 (State v. Sawyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vitt
2012 Ohio 4438 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Sawyer
2010 Ohio 923 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)