State v. Santiago

719 A.2d 1164, 245 Conn. 901, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 Conn. 301
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 15, 1998·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 19 (AC 14769), is denied.

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 15, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Santiago, 719 A.2d 1164, 245 Conn. 901, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 202 (Colo. 1998).

719 A.2d 1164 (State v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Santiago
708 A.2d 969 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)