State v. Sands
802 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17074, 2001 WL 1538515
Opinion
The State appeals from a non-final order granting defendant’s motion to suppress [418] evidence of his possession of drugs and a concealed weapon. The trial court, relying on Shadier v. State, 761 So.2d 279 (Fla.2000), ruled that if an officer’s reason for a traffic stop is based on misinformation, any evidence found as a result of the stop must be suppressed. We affirm, as the facts of this case are indistinguishable from those in Shadier.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sands, 802 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17074, 2001 WL 1538515 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
802 So. 2d 417 (State v. Sands) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shadler v. State
761 So. 2d 279 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)