State v. Sands

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Sands

802 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17074, 2001 WL 1538515

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 5, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-2575

StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 417 (State v. Sands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sands, 802 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17074, 2001 WL 1538515 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from a non-final order granting defendant’s motion to suppress [418]*418evidence of his possession of drugs and a concealed weapon. The trial court, relying on Shadier v. State, 761 So.2d 279 (Fla.2000), ruled that if an officer’s reason for a traffic stop is based on misinformation, any evidence found as a result of the stop must be suppressed. We affirm, as the facts of this case are indistinguishable from those in Shadier.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from a non-final order granting defendant’s motion to suppress [418]*418evidence of his possession of drugs and a concealed weapon. The trial court, relying on Shadier v. State, 761 So.2d 279 (Fla.2000), ruled that if an officer’s reason for a traffic stop is based on misinformation, any evidence found as a result of the stop must be suppressed. We affirm, as the facts of this case are indistinguishable from those in Shadier.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17074, 2001 WL 1538515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sands-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack