State v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sanders

118 S.W.3d 278, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1672, 2003 WL 22434104

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 28, 2003

DocketNo. WD 60740

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.W.3d 278 (State v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sanders, 118 S.W.3d 278, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1672, 2003 WL 22434104 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Michael Sanders appeals from his conviction of drug trafficking in the second degree. Sanders argues that the State failed to prove he had actual or constructive possession of the methamphetamine found in the basement of the house where he was staying. We hold the State introduced sufficient evidence for a reasonable trier of fact to find Sanders guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Michael Sanders appeals from his conviction of drug trafficking in the second degree. Sanders argues that the State failed to prove he had actual or constructive possession of the methamphetamine found in the basement of the house where he was staying. We hold the State introduced sufficient evidence for a reasonable trier of fact to find Sanders guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.W.3d 278, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1672, 2003 WL 22434104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sanders-moctapp-2003.