State v. Sanders

87 S.W.3d 870, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2006, 2002 WL 31260341
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Sanders. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1876
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 8, 2002·No. No. ED 80459·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Dennis Sanders, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault in violation of Section 565.060, RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the State to present irrelevant evidence.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice occurred. Rule 30.20. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sanders, 87 S.W.3d 870, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2006, 2002 WL 31260341 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

87 S.W.3d 870 (State v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.