State v. Salsman

247 S.W.3d 104, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 320, 2008 WL 638106
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 11, 2008·No. ED 87171·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*105 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Heather Salsman (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon her conviction of one count of a Class A misdemeanor of assault in the third degree, Section 565.070, RSMo 2000. Defendant asserts the trial court erred in entering judgment upon her conviction as the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Salsman, 247 S.W.3d 104, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 320, 2008 WL 638106 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 104 (State v. Salsman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McPherson v. McMAHON FORD COMPANY
247 S.W.3d 104 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)