McPherson v. McMAHON FORD COMPANY
This text of 247 S.W.3d 104 (McPherson v. McMAHON FORD COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Carol Sue McPherson and Ronald McPherson (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of McMahon Ford Company on the grounds that Plaintiffs cause of action for personal injuries was barred by the statute of limitations.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 S.W.3d 104, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-v-mcmahon-ford-company-moctapp-2008.