State v. Salazar

679 So. 2d 1183, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 399, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1641, 1996 WL 544209
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 26, 1996
DocketNo. 87010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 679 So. 2d 1183 (State v. Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Salazar, 679 So. 2d 1183, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 399, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1641, 1996 WL 544209 (Fla. 1996).

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Salazar v. State, 665 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified conflict with State v.

Lamoureux, 660 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash Salazar based on Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996). Melbourne applies to parts 1, 2, and 3 of section 316.193(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1993).

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castro v. State
685 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 So. 2d 1183, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 399, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1641, 1996 WL 544209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-salazar-fla-1996.