Castro v. State
685 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12332, 1996 WL 670551
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1996·No. No. 95-1729·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s three convictions under section 316.193(3)(c)l, Florida Statutes (1993). State v. Salazar, 679 So.2d 1183, (Fla. 1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759, (Fla. 1996). We reverse that portion of the written order' of probation which indicates that appellant may perform community service in lieu of costs of supervision. E.g., Royster v. State, 657 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the entry of an amended order of probation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castro v. State, 685 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12332, 1996 WL 670551 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
685 So. 2d 27 (Castro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phillips v. General Acc. Ins. Co.
685 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)