State v. Sailors

672 N.E.2d 161, 77 Ohio St. 3d 147
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 1996·No. No. 95-1002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its judgment entry.

Judgment affirmed.

Mover, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sailors, 672 N.E.2d 161, 77 Ohio St. 3d 147 (Ohio 1996).

672 N.E.2d 161 (State v. Sailors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Paraskevopoulos v. Indus. Comm.
1998 Ohio 122 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel. Paraskevopoulos v. Industrial Commission
699 N.E.2d 72 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Sailors
1996 Ohio 367 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)