State v. Said

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Said

659 N.E.2d 792, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1282

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Said. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 Ohio St. 3d 473 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 1996·No. No. 93-1085·Published

Opinion

A motion for reconsideration was granted in this cause on February 15,1995, in 71 Ohio St.3d 1467, 644 N.E.2d 1389, and oral arguments were again presented on December 12,1995.

[1283]*1283The motion for reconsideration requesting this court to reconsider its ruling in State v. Said (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 473, 644 N.E.2d 337, is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently granted.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A motion for reconsideration was granted in this cause on February 15,1995, in 71 Ohio St.3d 1467, 644 N.E.2d 1389, and oral arguments were again presented on December 12,1995.

[1283]*1283The motion for reconsideration requesting this court to reconsider its ruling in State v. Said (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 473, 644 N.E.2d 337, is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently granted.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.

State v. Said, 659 N.E.2d 792, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1282 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

659 N.E.2d 792 (State v. Said) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related