State v. Said

644 N.E.2d 1389, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 386
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1995
Docket93-1085; No. 92-L-018
StatusPublished

This text of 644 N.E.2d 1389 (State v. Said) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Said, 644 N.E.2d 1389, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 386 (Ohio 1995).

Opinion

Reported at 71 Ohio St.3d 473, 644 N.E.2d 337. On motion for reconsideration and on motion to supplement the record. Motions granted; the parties may file briefs on all issues, pursuant to the schedule established in S.Ct.Prac.R. VI; and this cause shall be set for oral arguments.

Pfeifer, J., dissents. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Said
1994 Ohio 402 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 N.E.2d 1389, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-said-ohio-1995.