Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Clark

State v. Clark

662 N.E.2d 362, 75 Ohio St. 3d 412
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 1996·No. No. 95-2332·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the decision of the court of appeals based upon appellant’s failure to demonstrate a genuine issue as to whether his appellate counsel provided constitutionally adequate representation.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Clark, 662 N.E.2d 362, 75 Ohio St. 3d 412 (Ohio 1996).

662 N.E.2d 362 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Phillips
98 P.3d 838 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
State v. Swinton
847 A.2d 921 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)
State v. Clark
1996 Ohio 2 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)